Bareboat charter and reimbursed statutory levies are excluded from service tax value in dredging contracts.

A bareboat charter of dredgers and vessels transferring possession and effective control to the charterer falls outside taxable supply of tangible goods service under section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994, because the charterer operates the vessels as if they were its own during the charter period. Reimbursed customs duty, entry tax and similar statutory levies paid on actual basis are not consideration for dredging services and cannot be added to taxable value under Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Valuation) Rules, 2006. The resulting demand and penalties are unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether chartering of dredgers and vessels from foreign owners under a bareboat charter amounted to supply of tangible goods service taxable on reverse charge basis; (ii) whether customs duty, entry tax and similar statutory levies reimbursed by the clients formed part of the taxable value of dredging services.

Issue (i): Whether chartering of dredgers and vessels from foreign owners under a bareboat charter amounted to supply of tangible goods service taxable on reverse charge basis.

Analysis: The relevant charge under section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 applied only where tangible goods were supplied without transferring right of possession and effective control. On a reading of the charter agreement as a whole, the vessels were delivered to the charterer, kept under its full possession and control during the charter period, maintained and operated at its expense, and redelivered after expiry. Restrictions on place of use and sub-chartering did not negate the transfer of possession and effective control. A bareboat charter is treated as one where the charterer operates the vessel as if it were its own for the charter period.

Conclusion: The arrangement was outside the scope of taxable supply of tangible goods service and was not liable to service tax under reverse charge.

Issue (ii): Whether customs duty, entry tax and similar statutory levies reimbursed by the clients formed part of the taxable value of dredging services.

Analysis: The amounts represented statutory levies incurred on import and movement of goods used for dredging and were reimbursed on actual basis under the contractual arrangement. Such amounts were not consideration for the service itself. Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Valuation) Rules, 2006 could not justify inclusion of reimbursed taxes and duties in the taxable value, and the statutory levies were not part of the service consideration.

Conclusion: The reimbursed customs duty, entry tax and similar levies were not includible in the taxable value of dredging services.

Final Conclusion: The demand and penalties were unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Under section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994, a bareboat charter transferring possession and effective control of vessels is not taxable as supply of tangible goods service, and reimbursed statutory levies do not form part of the taxable value unless they are part of the service consideration.

---