Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Customs Duty Order & Penalties for Non-Compliance</h1> <h3>Thapar Ispat Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi-III</h3> Thapar Ispat Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi-III - 2018 (364) E.L.T. 584 (Tri. - Chan.) Issues Involved:1. Double benefit availed under Notification No.203/92-CUS and failure to fulfill export obligation.2. Confiscation and penalty imposed under the Customs Act.3. Applicability of Notification No.83/90-Cus for concessional duty.4. Procedural conditions and their impact on substantive benefit.5. Levy of additional duty of customs (CVD).6. Invocation of the extended period of limitation.7. Alleged misdeclaration and suppression of facts.Detailed Analysis:1. Double Benefit and Export Obligation:The appellant imported HMS scrap under Value Based Advance Licence and availed customs duty exemption under Notification No.46/93-Cus and additional duty exemption under Notification No.44/93-CE. However, it was found that the appellant availed double benefit under Notification No.203/92-CUS and failed to fulfill the export obligation within the specified period. Consequently, a show cause notice was issued, and the Commissioner of Customs ordered the payment of basic customs duty, additional duty, and imposed a fine and personal penalty.2. Confiscation and Penalty:The Commissioner ordered the payment of basic customs duty amounting to Rs. 12,08,520 and additional duty of Rs. 3,57,445. The imported scrap was ordered to be confiscated under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, and a fine of Rs. 3,00,000 was imposed in lieu of confiscation. A personal penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 was also imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act.3. Applicability of Notification No.83/90-Cus:The appellant contended that the duty should be payable under Notification No.83/90-Cus, which grants concessional duty for specified iron and steel melting scrap used in electric arc or induction furnace. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner to consider this plea. The Commissioner found that the appellant did not fulfill the conditions of Notification No.83/90-Cus, such as timely production of an end-use certificate and genuine reasons for delay in consumption of the imported scrap.4. Procedural Conditions and Substantive Benefit:The appellant argued that procedural conditions should not deny substantive benefits. The Commissioner and Tribunal, however, held that the conditions under Notification No.83/90-Cus were substantive and mandatory. The Supreme Court's judgment in CCE, New Delhi Vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopal was cited, emphasizing that procedural requirements are essential to prevent misuse and diversion of imported goods.5. Levy of Additional Duty of Customs (CVD):The appellant argued against the levy of CVD, claiming eligibility for Modvat credit. The Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that CVD is required to be paid before clearance and cannot be waived on grounds of revenue neutrality. The cited cases involving central excise duty were found not comparable to the present case of imported goods.6. Invocation of Extended Period of Limitation:The appellant contended that the extended period of limitation was not invokable due to no suppression of facts. The Tribunal found that the appellant withheld information about availment of Modvat credit at the time of import, justifying the invocation of the extended period.7. Alleged Misdeclaration and Suppression of Facts:The appellant argued that there was no misdeclaration. The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly opted for a notification with specific end-use conditions and failed to comply, constituting misdeclaration and suppression of facts.Conclusion:The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner, confirming the demand of customs duty, additional duty, and rejecting the appellant's arguments regarding procedural conditions, CVD, and limitation. The appeal was dismissed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found