Health insurance credit exclusion and Rule 14 interest depend on employee-use bar and actual utilisation of credit.

Health insurance premium paid for CISF personnel was excluded from input service because the amended Rule 2(l) bars credit where health insurance is used primarily for the personal use or consumption of any employee, so the cenvat credit denial was sustained. Interest under Rule 14 was not payable because wrongly taken credit attracts interest only when it is also utilised; as the disputed credit was not used and sufficient balance remained, the interest demand was set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether service tax paid on medical insurance premium for health insurance is admissible as cenvat credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. (ii) Whether interest is payable under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 where the credit was taken but not utilized.

Issue (i): Whether service tax paid on medical insurance premium for health insurance is admissible as cenvat credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis: The amended definition of input service excludes health insurance when such service is used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee. The expression used in the exclusion clause is broad and is not confined to the assessee's own employees. As the insurance was for CISF personnel working for the appellant, the service fell within the exclusion and was not eligible for credit.

Conclusion: The denial of cenvat credit was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether interest is payable under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 where the credit was taken but not utilized.

Analysis: Interest under Rule 14 is attracted only when wrongly taken credit is also utilized. Where the assessee maintains sufficient credit balance and the disputed credit is not utilized, the statutory condition for levy of interest is not satisfied.

Conclusion: The demand of interest was set aside and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only on the question of interest, while the denial of cenvat credit on medical insurance premium was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Health insurance used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee is excluded from input service, and interest under Rule 14 arises only when wrongly taken credit is also utilized.

---