Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner had authority to withdraw the certificate issued under section 8(2) of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976, and whether section 21 of the General Clauses Act could be invoked to sustain such withdrawal.
Analysis: The declaration was accepted, tax was paid, the required investment was made, and the certificate under section 8(2) was issued after consideration of the material placed before the Commissioner. The Act contained no provision conferring a power of review, rectification, or cancellation of a certificate once issued. The issuance of the certificate was treated as a quasi-judicial act with final legal consequences under the Scheme, including the bar against refund under section 10 of the Act. Section 21 of the General Clauses Act could not be used to create an implied power of withdrawal where the scheme and object of the special Act did not support such a power. Re-examining whether the declaration fell within the clauses of section 3 after issuance of the certificate was held impermissible.
Conclusion: The Commissioner had no jurisdiction to withdraw the certificate, and the impugned cancellation order was invalid.