Tribunal allows deduction for justified service charges but disallows payments to specific intermediaries

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the disallowance of service charges claimed as a deduction. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of service charges paid to certain intermediaries but directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of the remaining service charges. The decision was based on the finding that while some service charges were justified due to market practices and necessity, payments to specific intermediaries were deemed unnecessary as the main supplier could provide the required services directly.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of Rs. 2,56,39,000 claimed as deduction by the assessee on account of payment of service charges.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Rs. 2,56,39,000 Claimed as Deduction by the Assessee on Account of Payment of Service Charges:

The assessee company filed its return of income for the assessment year 1985-86 on 22nd November 1985, declaring total income of Rs. 36,64,31,940. The Assessing Officer (AO) made various additions/disallowances, including the disallowance of Rs. 2,56,39,000 claimed as service charges towards the purchase of split palm kernel fatty acid. The AO disallowed the payment on the grounds that the assessee failed to provide conclusive evidence that services were actually rendered, deeming the payments as motivated by extra-commercial considerations and not incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

The learned Commissioner (Appeals) (CIT(A)) initially restored the issue to the AO to examine all details furnished by the assessee and to allow the assessee to cross-examine the witnesses whose statements were relied upon. Upon re-examination, the AO accepted the purchases of palm kernel fatty acid as genuine but disallowed the service charges for lack of evidence of actual services rendered. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, agreeing that the assessee failed to establish the necessity and business expediency of the payments.

The assessee argued that the necessity of purchasing the split palm kernel fatty acid arose due to a government ban on the import of tallow, leading to a shortage of soap-making oil and increased demand and prices for oils/fatty acids. The assessee contended that traders with import licenses cornered the imported oil and sold it at their terms, including service charges, which were commercially viable and necessary for continuing manufacturing activities. The assessee provided contracts and confirmations from sellers and intermediaries to substantiate the payments and argued that other soap manufacturers also paid similar service charges.

The Departmental Representative maintained that the assessee failed to produce conclusive evidence of services rendered and questioned the necessity of paying service charges when the purchases were made directly from the suppliers. The Department argued that the payments were not incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

The Tribunal examined the factual aspects and found that the assessee's claim of purchasing imported palm kernel fatty acid due to local shortages and higher prices was correct and undisputed. The Tribunal noted that the price paid for the purchases was at arm's length and that the contracts provided by the assessee indicated that services were indeed rendered by the intermediaries. The Tribunal also considered that other soap manufacturers paid similar service charges, supporting the assessee's claim of market practice.

However, the Tribunal observed that in cases where Golden Tobacco Co. Ltd. directly supplied the palm kernel fatty acid to the assessee, there was no necessity to pay service charges to other intermediaries, as Golden Tobacco Co. Ltd. itself was capable of providing the required services. Consequently, the Tribunal disallowed service charges of Rs. 12.50 lakh and Rs. 5.59 lakh paid to PPL Plastics Ltd. and Raigarh Papers Ltd., respectively, totaling Rs. 18.09 lakh. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the balance amount of service charges paid as a deduction.

In conclusion, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the AO to allow the deduction of service charges except for the amounts paid to PPL Plastics Ltd. and Raigarh Papers Ltd.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 26.02.2018.

---