Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the discount passed by the manufacturer to the wholesale distributor constituted commission taxable as business auxiliary service, or was only trade discount in a sale transaction.
Analysis: The agreement provided that ownership of the goods passed to the wholesale distributor after supply, the distributor was to take possession at the factory gate, and the goods were sold at a price determined by the manufacturer. The invoices showed VAT charged on the transactions and reflected a sale on principal-to-principal basis. On these facts, the discount passed on by the manufacturer was part of the trading margin and not consideration for any service. Once the underlying transaction was a sale, there was no service provider-service recipient relationship to attract service tax.
Conclusion: The discount could not be treated as commission liable to service tax, and the demand was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the transaction is a genuine sale on principal-to-principal basis and the amount passed on is trade discount, it does not constitute taxable commission or consideration for service.