Cenvat credit refund for export-linked input services upheld; no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's view.

Refund of Cenvat credit under the relevant notifications was allowed for input services used in export activity because the Tribunal found a direct nexus between the services and exports, including banking and financial services and technical inspection and certification services. The High Court held that the Revenue's narrower construction was unsupported, and that the Tribunal's reasoning was backed by the record and binding precedent. No error of law, perversity, or jurisdictional infirmity was shown, so no substantial question of law arose. The assessee's claim therefore remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to refund of Cenvat credit under the relevant notifications in respect of input services used for export activity, and whether any substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's order.

Analysis: The Tribunal had held that the services in question, including banking and financial services and technical inspection and certification services, were input services having direct relation with export activity and that the restrictive construction urged by the Revenue was too narrow. The High Court found that the Tribunal's view was supported by the record and by binding precedent, and that no error of law, perversity, or other jurisdictional infirmity was shown in the Tribunal's reasoning.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The appeal was held to disclose no substantial question of law.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the grant of refund failed, and the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's claim was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the Tribunal's finding that input services had the requisite nexus with export activity is supported by the record and binding precedent, no substantial question of law arises in appeal.

---