Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application for advance ruling was barred under the admissibility proviso on the ground that the questions involved valuation or determination of fair market value, and whether the objection based on alleged tax avoidance could prevent admission of the application.
Analysis: The questions raised were directed to the legal chargeability of capital gains on the proposed transfer and not to the quantification of consideration or valuation of the shares. The computation of capital gains may involve valuation, but that circumstance alone does not bring the application within the exclusion for matters requiring determination of fair market value. The objection founded on profit shifting or tax avoidance was treated as speculative and unsupported by a clear legal basis; it was not accepted as a present bar to admission. The authority also noted that any avoidance-related issue could be raised, if necessary, at the later stage of proceedings under the relevant provision governing the merits stage.
Conclusion: The application was held maintainable and admitted for ruling on the questions raised, while the avoidance objection was left open for consideration at the appropriate stage.