Tribunal overturns order, dismisses clandestine removal charges for lack of evidence.

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, finding the Department's allegations of clandestine removal unsupported by sufficient evidence. Emphasizing the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity of substantial proof to establish charges of clandestine removal. Relying solely on third-party evidence without verification or corroboration was deemed insufficient in legal proceedings, as seen in the cases of M/s Balaji v/s CCE Raipur and Continental Cement Company v. Union of India.

---

---

Issues: Allegation of clandestine removal without sufficient evidence

Analysis:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing M S Steel Bars and Rods, filed appeals against Order-in-Original No.61/2017 dated 08/11/2016, alleging clandestine removal of goods without duty payment based on recovered documents from a transporter. The Department's case relied on the transporter's statement and register entries, without verifying sales recipients or raw material consumption. The Tribunal noted the lack of evidence linking unaccounted goods to sales or raw material usage, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence from third-party documents. Citing the case of M/s Balaji v/s CCE Raipur, the Tribunal held that the Department failed to prove clandestine removal. Referring to Continental Cement Company v. Union of India, the Tribunal stressed the necessity of detailed investigation and corroborative evidence to sustain allegations of clandestine removal, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found the Department's allegations of clandestine removal lacking in supporting evidence, highlighting the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence in such cases. By setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals, the Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial proof to establish charges of clandestine removal, as mere reliance on third-party evidence without verification or corroboration is insufficient in legal proceedings.

---