Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether interim bail should be granted during pendency of the writ petition challenging the legality of the arrest and detention under the PMLA.
Analysis: The petition raised a prima facie challenge to the arrest procedure, including compliance with the PMLA and the applicable criminal procedure safeguards. The Court found a prima facie case that the arrest on 25 January 2018 was contrary to Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and that the procedure followed was not in consonance with Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Petitioner had been in custody since 25 January 2018, and the need for continued judicial custody was not explained. The Petitioner also undertook to cooperate with the investigation and to appear when required.
Conclusion: Interim bail was granted to the Petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition, subject to conditions.
Final Conclusion: The Petitioner obtained temporary release pending adjudication of the larger legal questions, while the main writ petition was left for consideration by a larger Bench.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Court finds a prima facie illegality in arrest and no demonstrated necessity for continued custody, interim bail may be granted pending final adjudication, subject to suitable conditions.