Construction linked to hydro-electric dam works is excluded from taxable construction service; miscellaneous receipts require fresh verification.

Construction intrinsically connected with a dam in a hydro-electric project, including barrage, intake, sedimentation chamber and allied civil works, fell within the exclusion from Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, and construction of a tunnel extension was also treated as excluded; the service tax demand on this count was not sustainable. Amounts reflected as miscellaneous receipts, stated to include scrap sales, obsolete material and written-off balances, required fresh verification because the documentary record was incomplete; the demand on this issue was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether construction activities forming part of a hydro-electric project and construction of a tunnel extension were taxable under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, and (ii) whether amounts shown under miscellaneous receipts were liable to service tax as Business Support Service consideration.

Issue (i): Whether construction activities forming part of a hydro-electric project and construction of a tunnel extension were taxable under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service.

Analysis: The exclusion under the relevant service tax framework was applied to work that was integrally connected with construction of a dam in a hydro-electric project, since the civil works such as barrage, intake, sedimentation chamber and allied structures were carried out as part of the project and therefore fell outside the taxable net. Construction of a tunnel was also treated as specifically excluded from Commercial and Industrial Construction Service.

Conclusion: The demand on this issue was not sustainable and was upheld against the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether amounts shown under miscellaneous receipts were liable to service tax as Business Support Service consideration.

Analysis: The receipts were stated to consist of sale of scrap, obsolete material, written-off balances and similar incidental items. Since the documentary record before the adjudicating authority was incomplete, the matter required fresh examination on the basis of the full set of documents and after granting an effective hearing in de novo proceedings.

Conclusion: The demand on this issue was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the construction-related demand failed, while the assessee obtained remand on the miscellaneous receipts issue for fresh adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Construction intrinsically connected with a dam in a hydro-electric project and construction of a tunnel extension fell within the exclusion from Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, while liability based on miscellaneous receipts could not be sustained without complete evidentiary verification.

---