1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal affirms Commissioner's remand order in service tax case, stresses compliance with legal procedures.</h1> The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s remand order in a service tax matter, affirming the Commissioner's authority to remand cases under Service Tax ... Jurisdiction - power of Commissioner (A) to remand - Held that: - there is no infirmity in the impugned order whereby the Commissioner (A) has only remanded the matter to the original authority - the Commissioner (A) has the power to remand the case to the original authority under the Service Tax - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. Issues: Appeal against remand order by Commissioner (A) in service tax matter.Analysis:1. Facts of the Case: The appellant was found to have collected service tax from recipients but failed to remit it to the government for the period April 2005 to March 2009. Additionally, they provided services beyond security agency services without filing ST-3 returns or paying service tax. The proprietor admitted non-payment of service tax and lack of awareness regarding taxability of certain services.2. Legal Arguments: The Revenue contended that the Commissioner (A) lacked the authority to remand the case and that the appellant did not produce necessary documents before the authorities. The appellant's counsel argued that all required documents were submitted to the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (A) along with written submissions. They cited various decisions supporting the Commissioner's power to remand the matter.3. Decision: The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s remand order, citing settled law that the Commissioner (A) has the power to remand cases under Service Tax laws. The Tribunal found no fault in the remand order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Relevant case laws were referred to in support of this decision.This judgment clarifies the authority of the Commissioner (A) to remand cases in service tax matters and emphasizes the importance of producing necessary documents during proceedings. The decision highlights the significance of following due process and adhering to legal principles in tax disputes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
