Tribunal upholds deduction for agricultural credit society under Section 80P(2)

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80P(2) for the primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The Tribunal concluded that the Supreme Court's judgment in The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited was not applicable to the case, emphasizing the importance of actual activities over registration status. The Tribunal also highlighted the Reserve Bank of India's jurisdiction in determining the society's classification.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Denial of deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Applicability of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited.
3. Interpretation of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, and its impact on Section 80P(2) eligibility.
4. The principle of mutuality and its application to the assessee.
5. Jurisdictional competence of the Assessing Officer in determining the nature of the assessee's activities.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Denial of Deduction Under Section 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee, a primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, claimed a deduction under Section 80P(2) amounting to Rs. 35,97,750/- for the assessment year 2013-14. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, reasoning that the assessee was engaged mainly in the business of banking, and with the insertion of sub-section (4) to Section 80P effective from 01/04/2007, the assessee was not entitled to the deduction.

2. Applicability of the Supreme Court Judgment in The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited:
The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision, arguing that the CIT(A) erroneously relied on the Kerala High Court's judgment in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. The Revenue contended that the Supreme Court's decision in The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax should prevail. The Supreme Court had emphasized examining the actual activities of the society rather than relying solely on its registration status.

3. Interpretation of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, and Its Impact on Section 80P(2) Eligibility:
The CIT(A) allowed the deduction based on the Kerala High Court's ruling that a primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act is entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2). The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the Kerala High Court had categorically held that once a society is classified as a primary agricultural credit society by the competent authority, it is entitled to the deduction.

4. The Principle of Mutuality and Its Application to the Assessee:
The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court's judgment in The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited case was rendered in the context of a Credit Co-operative Society and not a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. The Tribunal emphasized that the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act includes nominal members within the definition of 'members,' which differs from the situation in The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited case, where nominal members were not considered actual members.

5. Jurisdictional Competence of the Assessing Officer:
The Tribunal pointed out that under the Banking Regulation Act, the Reserve Bank of India is the competent authority to determine whether a society is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer did not have the jurisdiction to decide this issue, especially when the Reserve Bank of India had classified the assessee as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80P(2). The Tribunal concluded that the Supreme Court's judgment in The Citizens Co-Operative Society Limited was not applicable to the facts of the present case. The Tribunal upheld that the CIT(A) was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction, as the assessee was a primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.

---