Cenvat credit refund claim upheld where invoice details, credit timing and service nexus objections were not substantiated.

Refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules read with Notification No. 27/2012-CE (N.T.) was sustained despite objections on invoice description, timing of credit availment, and nexus with output service. The appellate authority had addressed each objection and relied on Tribunal precedents, and no effective rebuttal or infirmity in that reasoning was shown. The refund claim was therefore upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules read with Notification No. 27/2012-CE (N.T.) was rightly allowed despite objections regarding invoice description, timing of credit availment, and nexus with output service.

Analysis: The dispute concerned a refund claim under the Cenvat credit refund mechanism for the relevant period. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dealt with each objection raised by the Revenue and allowed the claim on the basis of Tribunal decisions. The appeal did not disclose any effective rebuttal to those findings, and no infirmity was found in the order under challenge.

Conclusion: The refund claim was upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed.

---