Central Excise Appeals upholds recovery demand against Emerson Network Power for SEZ goods supply without adequate proof.

The Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai - II confirmed the recovery demand and penalty against M/s Emerson Network Power (I) Pvt Ltd for failure to produce required proof for supplying goods to Special Economic Zones. Despite the appellant's documentation showing no diversion of goods, the lower authorities did not adequately consider the evidence. The judgment remanded the case for proper verification and granted the appellant an opportunity to defend themselves in case of a negative report from the range officer, emphasizing the importance of fair proceedings.

---

---

Issues involved:
Confirmation of recovery demand, imposition of penalty for non-submission of required proof for supply of goods to Special Economic Zones.

Analysis:
The Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai - II confirmed the recovery demand of `3,79,040 along with interest and penalty for failure to produce two duly discharged ARE-1s related to the supply of uninterrupted power supply systems to units in Special Economic Zones by the appellant, M/s Emerson Network Power (I) Pvt Ltd. The appellant contended that the goods were supplied, received consideration, and no diversion occurred. However, the first appellate authority failed to properly consider the documentation provided, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal but confirmation of the lower authority's order.

The appellant had provided documentation supporting their claim that the goods were not diverted, and the authorized officer had dispatched the duly discharged ARE-1s to the appellant's range officer as per SEZ procedures. The failure of the lower authorities to verify this information necessitated setting aside the impugned order and restoring the matter to the original authority for proper ascertainment. The appellant is to be given an opportunity to defend themselves in case of a negative report from the range officer.

The judgment concluded by disposing of the appeal through remand, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and giving the appellant a fair chance to present their case.

---