Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under Section 12-B(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 could be levied on the basis of rectification orders under Section 25-A when no provisional assessment had been made under Section 12-B(3) and the tax paid matched the returns filed.
Analysis: The liability to pay interest under Section 12-B(2) arises only where there is default in payment of advance tax for a month or quarter beyond the prescribed period, or where the tax paid is less than the tax payable on the basis of the returns. The scheme of Section 12-B, read as a whole, shows that interest is linked to the dealer's own return-based tax liability and not to a subsequent enhancement arising from rectification of assessment. In the absence of a provisional assessment under Section 12-B(3) rejecting the returns as incorrect or incomplete, and where the tax already paid corresponded to the returns filed, the rectification-based demand for interest could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Interest under Section 12-B(2) was not leviable on the rectification demand in the absence of provisional assessment under Section 12-B(3); the revision petitions failed.