Manpower supply tax and reimbursable expenses: individual provider outside pre-2006 levy, and excluded costs not part of taxable value.

For the period before 1-5-2006, the taxable entry for Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service applied only to a "commercial concern"; an individual providing manpower did not fall within that wording, so the levy was not attracted for that period. Reimbursable expenses such as wages, bonus, ESI and provident fund were also held outside the taxable value because the Board's circular excluded them and the cited precedent supported that treatment. On both issues, the demand was held unsustainable and consequential relief followed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether an individual engaged in providing manpower could be taxed under the category of Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service during the period when the definition covered only a commercial concern; (ii) Whether reimbursable expenses such as wages, bonus, ESI and provident fund were includible in the taxable value.

Issue (i): Whether an individual engaged in providing manpower could be taxed under the category of Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Service during the period when the definition covered only a commercial concern.

Analysis: The relevant period was prior to 1-5-2006, when the statutory definition used the expression "commercial concern". The appellant was an individual and not a commercial concern. The substitution of the words "any person" took effect only from 1-5-2006 and could not govern the disputed period.

Conclusion: The levy under this category was not applicable to the appellant for the relevant period.

Issue (ii): Whether reimbursable expenses such as wages, bonus, ESI and provident fund were includible in the taxable value.

Analysis: The Board's circular clarified that such expenses were not includible in the taxable value, and the position was supported by the cited precedent. On that basis, the demand could not be sustained on the reimbursable expenses component.

Conclusion: The reimbursable expenses were not includible in the taxable value.

Final Conclusion: The demand was held to be unsustainable and the assessee succeeded in appeal with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the taxable entry is confined to a commercial concern for the relevant period, an individual service provider does not fall within it, and reimbursable expenses excluded by binding circular guidance are not part of the taxable value.

---