Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit taken on scrap purchased from a registered dealer was admissible, and whether the demand and consequential penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The scrap was purchased on the strength of invoices issued by a registered dealer. There was no allegation that the goods were not duty paid, nor any allegation that the inputs were not received in the factory. In such circumstances, and in light of the settled requirement that an assessee dealing with a first stage dealer is discharged of responsibility when acting with reasonable diligence under Rule 9(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the presumption against admissibility could not be maintained. The show cause notice was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The Cenvat credit was held admissible, the demand was set aside, and the penalty could not survive. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the Revenue appeal was dismissed.