Appeal dismissed: disallowed expenses deemed capital, not business expenses. Lack of evidence on business purpose.

The appeal was dismissed in its entirety. The tribunal upheld the CIT-(A)'s decisions on disallowing both the amounts of Rs. 5,60,835/- and Rs. 67,62,806/- from Legal and Professional Expenses. The tribunal found the disallowances to be capital in nature and not allowable as business expenses. The decision was based on the lack of evidence regarding the business purpose of the expenses and was supported by relevant judicial precedents.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of the impugned order dated 22.05.2012.
2. Disallowance of Rs. 5,60,835/- out of Legal & Professional Expenses.
3. Disallowance of Rs. 67,62,806/- out of Legal and Professional Expenses for being capital in nature.
4. General grounds of appeal.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of the Impugned Order:
- The first ground of appeal was general in nature and did not require specific adjudication. Therefore, it was dismissed as infructuous.

2. Disallowance of Rs. 5,60,835/- out of Legal & Professional Expenses:
- Facts: The assessee debited a provision of Rs. 49.50 lakhs towards legal and professional expenses, deducted TDS of Rs. 5,60,835/-, and showed the balance as a liability. The liability was written back in the subsequent year and offered for tax.
- Assessing Officer's View: The provision was considered an unascertained liability. Since the assessee did not confirm the issuance of TDS certificates or whether the parties claimed TDS credit, the AO disallowed Rs. 5,60,835/-.
- CIT-(A)'s Decision: The CIT-(A) confirmed the disallowance, stating that TDS paid without incurring actual expenditure cannot be considered a business expense.
- Tribunal's Analysis: The tribunal upheld the CIT-(A)'s decision, agreeing that the TDS amount was not incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The tribunal noted that the assessee failed to explain the business purpose of the TDS amount and did not provide evidence of TDS deposit.

3. Disallowance of Rs. 67,62,806/- out of Legal and Professional Expenses:
- Facts: The amount was incurred as professional fees for issuing preference shares. The bill was raised in the preceding year but received and paid in the year under consideration.
- Assessing Officer's View: The AO disallowed the amount as it was related to raising preference shares, which is a capital expenditure.
- CIT-(A)'s Decision: The CIT-(A) confirmed the disallowance, stating that the expenses were for raising share capital and thus capital in nature. The CIT-(A) cited judicial precedents, including Hindustan Gas & Industries Ltd. and Punjab State Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd., to support the decision.
- Tribunal's Analysis: The tribunal upheld the CIT-(A)'s decision, agreeing that the expenses were related to raising share capital and thus not allowable as revenue expenditure. The tribunal found the CIT-(A)'s findings well-reasoned and without error.

4. General Grounds of Appeal:
- The fourth ground of appeal was also general in nature and dismissed as infructuous.

Conclusion:
- The appeal of the assessee was dismissed in its entirety. The tribunal upheld the CIT-(A)'s decisions on both disallowances, finding them well-reasoned and supported by relevant judicial precedents. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 31st January 2018.

---