ITAT rules fee levy under section 234E unsustainable. Assessee's appeal allowed, emphasizing legal compliance.

The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the levy of fee under section 234E was unsustainable in law. The ITAT accepted the grievance of the assessee as justified and deleted the impugned levy of fee under section 234E. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions and limitations in fee imposition under the Income Tax Act.

---

---

Issues:
Levy of fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act while processing the statement filed by the assessee under section 200A.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Levy of Fee under Section 234E
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon, regarding the levy of late filing fees under section 234E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had raised concerns about the imposition of fees despite a clerical mistake in the initial appeal form. The main contention was whether the fees imposed were justified under the law.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Intimation under Section 200A
The assessing authority had imposed late filing fees under section 234E based on the intimation under section 200A of the Act. The assessee argued that the intimation was not equivalent to a separate order passed under section 234E. The ITAT, after careful examination, concluded that the intimation in form No. 35 could not be presumed as an order passed under section 234E itself.

Issue 3: Legal Validity of Fee Imposition
The ITAT referred to precedents, including the case of M/s. Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan, to determine the legality of fee imposition under section 234E before the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2015. The ITAT highlighted that the assessing authority could pass a separate order under section 234E for fee levy, provided the limitation had not expired.

Issue 4: Scope of Adjustments under Section 200A
The ITAT emphasized that the adjustment for levy of fees under section 234E was beyond the permissible scope of adjustments under section 200A before 01/06/2015. It was clarified that such a levy could not be effected during the intimation process under section 200A without a specific enabling provision.

Conclusion:
The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the levy of fee under section 234E was unsustainable in law. The ITAT accepted the grievance of the assessee as justified and deleted the impugned levy of fee under section 234E. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions and limitations in fee imposition under the Income Tax Act.

---