Tribunal grants credit for pre-2011 services in construction dispute

The tribunal allowed the appellant, a global engineering and construction contractor, to avail credit for event management and mediclaim services for the period before April 2011. The tribunal emphasized the broad scope of the pre-2011 definition of input services and cited relevant case law to support its ruling, setting aside the denial by the Commissioner (Appeals) and granting the appellant relief.

---

---

Issues: Denial of input service credit on event management services and mediclaim services for the period from April 2010 to March 2011.

Analysis:
The appellant, a global engineering and construction contractor, availed CENVAT credit of service tax paid for project management, procurement, and engineering design services provided to Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The Department issued a show cause notice proposing to demand wrongly availed input service credit for services like rent-a-cab, tour operator, immovable property renting, general insurance (medi claim), and event management. The original authority denied credit on event management and mediclaim services, stating they lacked nexus with output services. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand for some services but upheld the denial for event management and mediclaim services. The appellant appealed against this denial.

The appellant's counsel argued that the disputed period predated the change in the definition of input services on April 1, 2011, which previously included "activities relating to business." Citing relevant case law, including the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's decision in Commissioner Vs. Ultratech Cement Ltd., the Tribunal's decision in PTC Software India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune, and other judgments, the counsel contended that credits for insurance and event management services should be allowed.

The Assistant Commissioner reiterated the findings in the impugned order during the hearing. Upon hearing both sides, the tribunal noted that the pre-2011 definition of input services had a broad scope, covering almost all services. Referring to the cited judgments, including those from the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court and previous tribunal decisions, the tribunal held that the appellants were eligible for credit on event management and mediclaim services. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.

In conclusion, the tribunal's decision allowed the appellant to avail credit for event management and mediclaim services, emphasizing the broad scope of the pre-2011 definition of input services and citing relevant case law to support its ruling.

---