Reasonable cause under Section 80 can sustain penalty relief where service tax is paid and evasion intent is unproved.

Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were treated as unsustainable where the assessee, a State Government organisation, had already paid the service tax with interest, no corroborative evidence showed intent to evade, and the findings indicated absence of mens rea. Section 80 was applied to recognise reasonable cause for the failure, and the Revenue did not effectively dispute those factual findings. The result was that penalty relief was maintained and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalties imposed under Section 76 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were liable to be sustained in the facts of the case, particularly in view of the assessee's plea of reasonable cause under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis: The authority below had recorded that the assessee was a State Government organisation, had already deposited the entire service tax with interest, and that no corroborative evidence established an intention to evade tax. It further found absence of mens rea and held the penalties under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 to be unsustainable. Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 was noted as permitting non-imposition of penalty where reasonable cause for the failure is proved, and the Revenue did not effectively dispute the factual findings.

Conclusion: The penalties were not liable to be interfered with, and the appeal by the Revenue failed.

---