Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Land possession key for new unit; acquisition process procedural. Non-compliance doesn't impact exemption essence. Revision allowed.</h1> <h3>M/s Atul Gases (A Unit Of Atul Generator & Pipe Co.) Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, U.P. Lucknow And Another</h3> M/s Atul Gases (A Unit Of Atul Generator & Pipe Co.) Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, U.P. Lucknow And Another - [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 446 (All) Issues Involved:1. Whether the condition of allotment of land for the unit is a substantive/mandatory condition in the exemption notification.2. Whether the mode of acquisition of land is substantive or procedural for the purpose of granting tax exemption under Section 4-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Substantive/Mandatory Condition of Allotment of LandThe revisionist established a unit for manufacturing Oxygen Gas and sought exemption from payment of trade tax under Section 4-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The exemption was declined by the Tribunal on the grounds that the unit did not fulfill the condition of being allotted land for the factory as specified in the notification dated 15th January 2000. The Tribunal held that the revisionist's claim was not covered under the exemption notification, and consequently, its benefit would not enure to it.The court examined whether the condition of allotment of land is a substantive/mandatory condition in the exemption notification. The object of Section 4-A of the Act and the exemption notification is to promote industrial development by encouraging the establishment of new units. The court observed that possessing land is a mandatory condition for establishing a new unit, as the unit itself cannot come up in its absence. This condition has a direct nexus with the object sought to be achieved, i.e., increasing production or developing industry in the State.The court referred to previous notifications and noted that the condition of allotment of land specified in the notification dated 15th January 2000 was substituted by a subsequent notification dated 22nd December 2001, which allowed land to be obtained from any source. This change indicated that the mode of acquisition was not of relevance, rather, possessing land alone had relevance for the context.Issue 2: Procedural Nature of Mode of Acquisition of LandThe court analyzed whether the mode of acquisition of land is substantive or procedural. The revisionist argued that the mode of acquiring land is procedural and attaching importance to it is inconsistent with the object of the Act and the notification. The court referred to several judgments, including Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and others, and Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Industrial Coal Enterprises, which distinguished between substantive conditions and procedural requirements.The court concluded that while possessing land for establishing a new unit is a mandatory condition, the mode of acquisition of land is procedural. The court emphasized that non-compliance with procedural requirements should not affect the essence or substance of the exemption notification. The court noted that the notification dated 22nd December 2001, which eliminated the mode of acquisition for the purposes of granting exemption, supported this view.The court further observed that any distinction based on the mode of acquisition of land would be arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as it would have no nexus with the object sought to be achieved by Section 4-A of the Act or the exemption notification.Conclusion:The court held that possessing land for establishing a new unit is a mandatory condition, but the mode of acquisition of land is procedural. The non-compliance with the procedural requirement of mode of acquisition does not affect the essence or substance of the exemption notification. The revision was allowed in favor of the assessee, and the question posed for consideration was answered accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found