Kerala High Court rules on detention of consignments under SGST and CGST

The Kerala High Court found the detention of three consignments unjustified as they had valid invoices, contrary to the State Goods and Service Tax (SGST) Rules. The court noted that no prescribed documents exist under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act for interstate movements subject to tax under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act. However, the detention of the fourth consignment lacking a proper invoice was deemed justified. The court ordered the release of the first three consignments upon presentation of the judgment and instructed completion of adjudication proceedings for the fourth consignment within a week.

---

---

Issues: Detention of consignments under State Goods and Service Tax (SGST) Rules, validity of documents for interstate movement, justification of detention based on prescribed documents

In this judgment by the Kerala High Court, the petitioner challenged the detention notices (Exts.P4 and P6) issued for a consignment of goods being transported. The notices stated that three out of four consignments were detained because they lacked valid documents required under the State Goods and Service Tax (SGST) Rules for interstate sales. The fourth consignment, covered by Ext.P3 delivery chalan, was objected to for not having an invoice accompanying the goods despite indicating an interstate sale. The court heard arguments from both parties and found that the detention of the first three consignments, which had valid invoices, was unjustified. The court noted that there are no prescribed documents under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act for covering interstate movements subject to tax under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act. However, the detention of the fourth consignment was deemed justified as the accompanying document did not meet the requirement of an invoice to evidence the sale. The court directed the release of the first three consignments upon the petitioner presenting a copy of the judgment to the respondent. For the fourth consignment, the respondents were instructed to complete adjudication proceedings within a week after receiving the judgment.

---