Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal rules on service tax for university courses, grants penalty waiver</h1> <h3>National Institute for Career And Education (NICE) Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore</h3> National Institute for Career And Education (NICE) Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore - TMI Issues:1. Whether the courses conducted by the appellant are liable to service tax as commercial coaching and training services.2. Whether the courses conducted in collaboration with foreign universities are recognized as per Indian regulations.3. Whether the penalty under section 80 can be waived due to the interpretation of legal provisions.Analysis:Issue 1:The dispute revolved around the classification of courses conducted by the appellant as either educational services or commercial coaching and training services for the purpose of service tax. The Revenue contended that the courses were liable to service tax, while the appellant argued that the courses resulted in degrees recognized by Indian law, making them educational services. The impugned orders held that the courses were not recognized by competent authorities and thus not excluded from tax entry as educational services. However, the Tribunal found that the courses conducted by the appellant, in affiliation with a deemed university, did result in the issuance of degrees by the university. The Tribunal clarified that it is the university, recognized by the UGC, that issues degrees for courses conducted in affiliated institutes, not the institutes themselves. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on such courses.Issue 2:Regarding the courses conducted in collaboration with a foreign university, the Tribunal sought clarification on whether the degrees issued by the foreign university were recognized as per Indian regulations. The appellant failed to provide categorical evidence of recognition by the Association of Indian Universities (AIU) as mandated by the Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision that without such evidence, the courses were not recognized by Indian law, and thus, the appellant was liable to pay service tax on these courses.Issue 3:The appellant requested a waiver of penalty under section 80, citing the issue as a matter of interpretation of legal provisions without any malicious intent to evade taxes. The Tribunal agreed that section 80 could be invoked for the case and granted the waiver of penalties, considering the circumstances. Therefore, the penalties were set aside, and the appeals were partly allowed based on the Tribunal's findings on the main issues.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the first issue regarding courses conducted in affiliation with a deemed university but upheld the decision of the lower authorities on the courses conducted in collaboration with a foreign university. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the waiver of penalties under section 80 due to the interpretation of legal provisions and the lack of malicious intent by the appellant.