Tribunal directs reconsideration of ALP determination with adjustments for non-AE transactions

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the TPO/AO to reconsider the ALP determination by including non-AE transactions as comparables and making necessary adjustments for low capacity utilization. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Non-selection of internal TNMM as the most appropriate method.
2. Adjustment for low capacity utilization.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Non-Selection of Internal TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method:
The assessee contended that the internal TNMM should be adopted due to the functional similarity between AE and non-AE segments. The assessee argued that the products sold to both segments were identical, and the functions performed, assets employed, and risks assumed were similar. The TPO, however, rejected this claim, stating that the segmental details provided by the assessee were unreliable due to the allocation of direct and indirect costs without any basis. The DRP upheld the TPO's decision, noting that the non-AE segment was a minuscule part of the total exports and lacked sufficient details for a valid comparison. The Tribunal, however, found merit in the assessee's argument, citing previous judicial pronouncements that supported the use of internal comparables even if the turnover of non-AE transactions was smaller. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to reconsider the revised segmental profit and loss reports, including non-AE transactions as comparables in determining the ALP using the TNMM method afresh.

2. Adjustment for Low Capacity Utilization:
The assessee argued that low capacity utilization due to lesser demand resulted in some fixed costs remaining unrecovered, leading to lesser profitability. The DRP rejected this objection, citing previous years' decisions and stating that no adjustment for capacity utilization was warranted. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had not maintained records to indicate the unabsorbed overheads related to underutilization of capacity. The Tribunal emphasized the need for an adjustment for idle capacity when comparing with external comparables. It directed the assessee to submit segmental results based on the absorption of overheads on capacity utilization and idle capacity. The Tribunal instructed the TPO/AO to consider the revised segmental profit and loss reports and determine the ALP adjustment afresh.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the TPO/AO to reconsider the ALP determination by including non-AE transactions as comparables and making necessary adjustments for low capacity utilization. The other alternate grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed.

---