Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte order of the Tribunal should be recalled and the appeals restored on the ground of non-service of notice and violation of natural justice.
Analysis: The record showed that notices fixing the hearings were issued from time to time at the address furnished to the Tribunal, none of the notices was returned unserved, and registered acknowledgements were available for the relevant dates. The contention that the assessee had not received notice was not supported by reliable material, and the affidavit of the wife did not displace the documentary record of service. The Tribunal also noted that the earlier order was passed after hearing the Revenue and perusing the record, and no mistake apparent from the record or sufficient cause for recall was established.
Conclusion: The request for recall/restoration was rejected and the ex parte order was not disturbed.
Final Conclusion: The miscellaneous applications were dismissed because the Tribunal found due service of notice and no basis to reopen the earlier decision.
Ratio Decidendi: A recalled order cannot be granted merely on a bare allegation of non-service when the record shows due service of hearing notices and no sufficient cause or apparent error is established.