Seized diary entries need corroboration before sustaining an unexplained expenditure addition under income-tax law.

Entries in a seized diary or loose paper do not, by themselves, prove actual expenditure for an addition under section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that handwritten figures, names and dates were insufficient where the record did not show whether they represented quotations, estimates, receipts or payments, and no independent corroboration such as bills, vouchers, delivery challans or recipient confirmations was produced. Presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C could not be used to treat the entries as proved financial transactions. In the absence of corroborative evidence, the addition could not rest on suspicion or probabilities, and the Revenue's appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made under section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the basis of entries in the seized diary was sustainable in the absence of corroborative evidence.

Analysis: The seized diary contained handwritten entries against amounts, names and dates in some places, but the entries did not by themselves establish that any actual expenditure had been incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the record did not show whether the figures were quotations, estimates, receipts or payments, and there was no independent material such as bills, vouchers, delivery challans or confirmations from alleged recipients. The presumptions under section 132(4A) and section 292C did not extend to treating the figures as proven financial transactions. In the absence of corroborative evidence, the addition could not rest only on suspicion, probabilities or the assessee's proximity to political activity.

Conclusion: The addition under section 69C was not justified and was rightly deleted. The Revenue's appeal failed.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the alleged unexplained expenditure and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Entries in a seized diary or loose paper, independent corroboration, do not by themselves prove incurrence of expenditure so as to sustain an addition under section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---