Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported bulk Reishi Gano Powder and Ganocelium Powder were classifiable as Ayurvedic Proprietary Medicine under heading 30039011, or as food supplement under heading 21069099, and whether the benefit of Notification No. 53/2011 was available.
Analysis: The product identity before the Tribunal was found to be the same as that examined earlier in the analogous classification dispute. The decisive question was whether the goods satisfied the common parlance test for medicaments and whether their ingredients and marketing supported treatment or prevention of a specific disease. The product labels and promotional material indicated general health supplementation rather than cure of any identified ailment, and the mere description as an Ayurvedic product or possession of a drug licence was held not to control customs classification. The Tribunal also noted that reliance on Ayurvedic texts mentioning mushroom in a generic sense could not establish that the specific mushroom-based preparations were Ayurvedic medicaments for tariff purposes.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable as Ayurvedic Proprietary Medicine and were correctly classifiable as food supplement under the competing tariff heading; the Revenue's appeal succeeded and the impugned classification in favour of the importer was set aside.