Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether any referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order allowing Modvat credit on glass bottles and plastic crates included in the assessable value of aerated waters.
Analysis: The Tribunal had relied on an earlier decision between the same parties and recorded a factual finding, supported by a Chartered Accountant's certificate, that the cost of glass bottles and plastic crates was included on a pro rata basis in the assessable value of the final product. That factual finding satisfied the requirement of Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. In reference jurisdiction, the High Court would not re-appreciate evidence or disturb concurrent factual findings merely because another view was possible.
Conclusion: No question of law arose for reference, and the Revenue's petition was declined.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Tribunal's entitlement to Modvat credit rests on a factual finding that the packing material cost formed part of the assessable value, no referable question of law arises and the High Court will not re-examine the evidence in reference proceedings.