Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amalgamation of foreign companies with an Indian company, and the resulting transfer of assets and shares, gave rise to liability under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the hands of the amalgamating companies and their shareholders.
Analysis: The advance ruling turned on the interaction between the charging provision for capital gains and the specific exemptions for transfers made pursuant to an amalgamation. The conditions of an amalgamation under Section 2(1B) were satisfied because the property and liabilities of the amalgamating companies would vest in the Indian amalgamated company and the requisite shareholder participation would continue by virtue of the scheme. The transfer of assets by the amalgamating companies to the Indian company fell within Section 47(vi), and the transfer of shares by shareholders in consideration of allotment of shares in the amalgamated Indian company fell within Section 47(vii). The objection that the scheme was a mere tax avoidance device was rejected because a genuine business rationale was disclosed and the material did not justify disregarding the amalgamation as a sham or colourable device.
Conclusion: The amalgamation did not create capital gains tax liability in India in the hands of the applicants or their shareholders, and the statutory exemptions applied.