Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the facility of motor cab provided under the agreement amounted to a taxable service as a service provided by a rent-a-cab scheme operator and was liable to service tax.
Analysis: The charging scheme under the Finance Act covered services provided by a rent-a-cab scheme operator in relation to renting of a cab. The expression was not confined by any statutory distinction between renting and hiring, and the words were used in their ordinary and common parlance sense. The nature of possession and control of the vehicle was therefore not decisive for bringing the service within the tax net. The rent-a-cab scheme under the Motor Vehicles Act regulated licensing of operators and did not control the levy of service tax under the Finance Act.
Conclusion: The service fell within the definition of taxable service and was chargeable to service tax; the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the cab service provided under the agreement was held taxable under the service tax provisions.
Ratio Decidendi: A service of providing motor cabs under a rent-a-cab arrangement is taxable under the Finance Act even if the operator retains possession and control of the vehicle, since the statute does not draw a distinction between renting and hiring.