Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight and transportation charges separately collected over and above the invoice value are includible in the assessable value of excisable goods merely because they were not shown separately in the excise invoice.
Analysis: The demand was sustained below only on the footing that the freight was not separately indicated in the invoice issued under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2001. The separate disclosure of freight is relevant only to identify the actual amount of freight. Freight, by itself, is not includible in the assessable value, and the mode of reflection in the invoice does not alter its character where the amount is otherwise identifiable as transportation charges. If transportation is separately negotiated and ascertainable, the mere absence of a separate entry in the excise invoice does not make it liable to excise duty.
Conclusion: The freight and transportation charges were not includible in the assessable value, and the demand was not sustainable.