Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of drawings and designs supplied free by the customer was includible in the assessable value of the manufactured goods under the Central Excise valuation rules.
Analysis: Buyer-supplied drawings and designs can form part of the assessable value as additional consideration under Rule 6 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 read with Explanation I, because such items used in production are ordinarily liable to be added. On the facts found, however, the designs were about 22 years old, the copyright was no longer applicable, they were already in the public domain, and the Chartered Engineer certified them to have nil value. In these circumstances, no addition was justified on account of the designs.
Conclusion: The addition made towards the value of the designs could not be sustained and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned valuation adjustment was set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where customer-supplied drawings or designs are otherwise includible as additional consideration in excise valuation, no notional addition can be made if the evidence shows that such material had no commercial value and was available in the public domain.