Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether goods supplied by a domestic manufacturer were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. when the supply was made against International Competitive Bidding and the condition linked to customs exemption was satisfied.
Analysis: The Project Authority Certificate showed that the goods were meant for supply to a mega power project pursuant to International Competitive Bidding, satisfying the principal condition of the excise notification. The condition regarding customs exemption was examined in the light of the alternate customs notification and the prior decision in Kent Introl Pvt. Ltd., which held that domestic suppliers need only establish that the goods are exempt when imported and that import-specific conditions do not govern a domestic supply. Applying that view, the existence of customs exemption under the relevant notifications was sufficient to satisfy the excise notification condition.
Conclusion: The goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E., and the denial of the benefit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, granting the exemption benefit to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a domestic supply is made under International Competitive Bidding and the goods are exempt from customs duties when imported, import-specific conditions in the customs notification do not defeat the exemption available to the domestic supplier under the excise notification.