Assessment on manufacture or import needs evidence and proper notice; tax demand was set aside for lack of factual foundation.

Tax on self-manufactured shutters and channels could not be confirmed without material evidence of any manufacturing activity, because a best judgment approach cannot replace proof of manufacture. Tax on imported cement and iron and steel also failed where the record contained no evidence of import by the dealer. The demand was further unsustainable because it was raised without a show cause notice specifically alleging import or manufacture, leaving the assessment without a proper factual and procedural foundation. The revision was allowed, the Tribunal's order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law after considering the dealer's objections.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether tax could be confirmed on self-manufactured shutters and channels in the absence of evidence of any manufacturing activity. (ii) Whether tax on imported cement and iron and steel could be sustained without evidence of import on record. (iii) Whether the tax demand on imported cement and iron and steel and self-manufactured shutters and channels could be sustained without a show cause notice.

Issue (i): Whether tax could be confirmed on self-manufactured shutters and channels in the absence of evidence of any manufacturing activity.

Analysis: The record disclosed no finding by any authority that the dealer carried on a manufacturing activity or sold goods after manufacturing them. The assessment and appellate orders proceeded without material evidence establishing manufacture, and the statutory definition of manufacturer required a factual basis showing sale of goods after manufacture. A best judgment approach could not substitute for proof of manufacturing activity.

Conclusion: The confirmation of tax on self-manufactured shutters and channels was unsustainable and was held in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether tax on imported cement and iron and steel could be sustained without evidence of import on record.

Analysis: The authorities recorded no material showing import of cement or iron and steel by the dealer. The finding on imported goods was therefore unsupported by evidence, and an assessment on imported cement could not stand merely on conjecture. Tax on imported goods required factual determination of import, which was absent.

Conclusion: The imposition of tax on imported cement and iron and steel was held unsustainable and was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether the tax demand on imported cement and iron and steel and self-manufactured shutters and channels could be sustained without a show cause notice.

Analysis: The challenge was that the assessment proceeded without a notice specifically alleging import or manufacture. In the absence of such foundational notice and corresponding factual findings, the demand could not be justified. The Tribunal's order was therefore liable to be interfered with for want of the necessary factual and procedural foundation.

Conclusion: The tax demand on the said goods could not be sustained and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The revision was allowed, the Tribunal's order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law after considering the dealer's objections.

Ratio Decidendi: A tax assessment based on manufacture or import must rest on material evidence and a proper factual foundation; in the absence of such evidence, confirmation of tax cannot be sustained.

---