Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were required to reverse Cenvat credit or pay amount under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 in respect of job-work services rendered for principal manufacturers who were paying central excise duty on the final products.
Analysis: The goods processed by the appellants were returned to principal manufacturers who discharged central excise duty on the final products. The exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was available only where the job-work activity related to goods used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable final products. In that situation, the appellants were entitled to avail Cenvat credit on inputs and input services under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Since the credit was legally available for the taxable activity undertaken, Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which applies to exempted output services, had no application.
Conclusion: The appellants were not required to reverse Cenvat credit under Rule 6, and the demand, interest, and penalties were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where job-work is performed on goods for a principal manufacturer who pays duty on the final products, the service is not one to which Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 can be applied to deny or reverse Cenvat credit legitimately available under Rule 3.