Tribunal ruling: Acid Slurry not synthetic detergent, Spent Sulphuric Acid dutiable as excisable goods

The tribunal ruled that Acid Slurry does not qualify as a synthetic detergent under notification no. 88/88 due to its primary usage as an input for detergent manufacturing, rather than being sold directly as a detergent in the consumer market. Additionally, the tribunal held that Spent Sulphuric Acid emerging during Acid Slurry production is a separate entity from the manufacturing inputs and is dutiable as excisable goods. The appeal was dismissed on 30/11/2017.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Eligibility of Acid Slurry for exemption under notification no. 88/88 dated 01.03.1988 as a synthetic detergent.
2. Dutiability of Spent Sulphuric Acid emerging during the manufacture of Acid Slurry.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Eligibility for exemption under notification no. 88/88:
The appellant claimed that Acid Slurry falls under Chapter heading 3402.90 and is eligible for exemption as a synthetic detergent under notification no. 88/88. The appellant argued that Acid Slurry is an organic surface active agent and is considered a synthetic detergent based on a test report by a chemical examiner. The appellant also contended that even if Acid Slurry is used for manufacturing synthetic detergents, it should be exempted under Sr. No. 28 of the notification. However, the respondent argued that Acid Slurry is not a detergent but an input for detergent manufacturing, hence not eligible for exemption. The tribunal noted that Acid Slurry, although having cleaning properties, is not sold as a synthetic detergent in the consumer market. The tribunal differentiated between Acid Slurry and synthetic detergent based on primary usage for washing clothes. The tribunal upheld that Acid Slurry does not qualify as a synthetic detergent under the notification.

Issue 2: Dutiability of Spent Sulphuric Acid:
Regarding the dutiability of Spent Sulphuric Acid emerging during Acid Slurry manufacturing, the tribunal referred to a previous decision stating that Spent acid, as a by-product, is excisable goods and liable for duty. The tribunal held that Spent Sulphuric Acid is a separate entity from the inputs used in Acid Slurry manufacture, making it dutiable.

In conclusion, the tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal on 30/11/2017.

---

---