Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of the property and the consequent liability to capital gains tax arose in the assessment year 2009-10 on the basis of the unregistered sale agreement and possession, or only in the assessment year 2010-11 on registration of the sale deed.
Analysis: The finding of the first appellate authority and the Tribunal was that the assessee had entered into a sale agreement, received consideration, and put the purchaser in possession in the earlier financial year, attracting the deeming provisions relating to transfer of a capital asset under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the statutory registration requirement referred to in the controversy. The Tribunal's conclusion rested on appreciation of the recorded facts, and the Court found no error of law in that factual determination. The Court also held that the Revenue's proposed questions did not give rise to any substantial question of law.
Conclusion: The transfer was held to have taken place in the earlier assessment year, and the capital gain was not taxable in assessment year 2010-11; the Revenue's challenge failed.