Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim relief could be granted in respect of the goods alleged to fall under Schedule C of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order, 2013 and consequently whether a No Objection Certificate could be directed at the interim stage.
Analysis: The challenge centered on whether the third category of goods was covered by Schedule C, including the item relating to Methyl Ethyl Ketone preparations. The order treated the requirement of a No Objection Certificate under clause 11 as a pre-condition for import of any controlled substance specified in Schedule C. Since the very entitlement to import depended on a final determination of that question, the Court held that interim relief affecting those goods could not be granted. The prayers seeking a clarification that no No Objection Certificate was required for past imports, or an interim direction to issue such certificates, were therefore found to be incapable of grant at that stage.
Conclusion: Interim relief was declined in relation to the goods said to fall under Schedule C and the No Objection Certificate issue was left for final adjudication.