TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Importer's Duty Exemption Denied Due to Expired License at Clearance</h1> <h3>COMMR. OF CUS. (EX.), CHENNAI-I Versus BANGALORE MANO FILAMENT PVT. LTD.</h3> COMMR. OF CUS. (EX.), CHENNAI-I Versus BANGALORE MANO FILAMENT PVT. LTD. - 2009 (241) E.L.T. 172 (Mad.) Issues Involved:1. Validity of the Advance Licence at the time of clearance.2. Applicability of Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962.3. Interpretation of relevant Circulars and Notifications.4. Tribunal's decision on duty exemption based on the date of shipment versus date of clearance.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of the Advance Licence at the time of clearance:The primary issue was whether the Advance Licence, which was valid at the time of import but expired before the clearance of goods from the warehouse, could still be used to claim duty exemption. The court held that the validity of the licence at the time of clearance is crucial. The Customs Act and relevant notifications clearly stipulate that a valid licence must be presented at the time of clearance to claim exemption.2. Applicability of Section 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962:Section 15(1)(b) specifies that the rate of duty applicable to warehoused goods is the rate in force on the date the goods are actually removed from the warehouse. The court affirmed that this section applies to determine the rate of duty and that the duty must be assessed based on the date of clearance, not the date of import or shipment.3. Interpretation of relevant Circulars and Notifications:The court examined various circulars and notifications, including Circular No. 12/95, Circular No. 51/95, and Circular No. 117/95. These circulars emphasize the necessity of verifying the validity of the licence at the time of clearance. The court highlighted that the Telegraphic Release Advice and other circulars stress the importance of a live and valid licence at the time of clearance, not just at the time of import.4. Tribunal's decision on duty exemption based on the date of shipment versus date of clearance:The Tribunal had held that the material imported should be covered by the DEEC licence, interpreting the notification to mean that the licence is for the goods and not specifically for the importer. However, the court found this interpretation erroneous, stating that the crucial question was whether the licence was valid at the time of clearance. The Tribunal's decision was based on a misinterpretation of the relevant legal provisions and Supreme Court precedents.Conclusion:The court concluded that the importer was not entitled to claim duty exemption as the Advance Licence had expired at the time of clearance. The Tribunal's order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The court emphasized that the incidence of duty depends on the time of clearance and that a valid licence must be presented at that time to claim exemption.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
