Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether HDPE/PP tapes, HDPE/PP fabrics and HDPE/woven sacks were correctly classifiable under Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and, if so, whether duty paid on such inputs was eligible for Modvat credit.
Analysis: The controversy was identical to an earlier Division Bench decision of the same Court, which had followed the Madhya Pradesh High Court and the Karnataka High Court in holding that the goods in question fell under Chapter 39 and not under the competing classifications suggested by the Revenue. That view was later affirmed by the Supreme Court, and the excise authorities themselves had also issued a circular classifying HDPE/PP fabrics, tapes and sacks under Chapter 39. On that basis, the Court accepted that the commodities for the relevant period were classifiable under Chapter 39 under the appropriate sub-headings and were inputs for the purpose of Modvat credit.
Conclusion: The classification under Chapter 39 was upheld and the assessee was held entitled to Modvat credit on the duty paid on the inputs; the impugned orders were set aside.