TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition challenging tender cancellation post-GST dismissed. Decision lawful due to tax law change.</h1> <h3>Nirmal Constructions Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh</h3> The HC of Madhya Pradesh dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of a tender post-GST implementation. The court held the decision was lawful due ... Cancellation of the tender in which the petitioner participated - change of tax regime - introduction of GST - Held that: - Since the entire tax regime has undergone change, therefore, the State Government's decision not to act upon the tenders invited with effect from 1.7.2017 to 5.8.2017 cannot be said to be illegal or arbitrary, which may warrant interference of this Court. In pursuance of the offer of the petitioner, letter of acceptance of the contract has not been communicated to the petitioner. Therefore, it is not a case of concluded contract. In the absence of concluded contract, the petitioner cannot claim right to seek grant of contract only on the basis of the offer submitted by the petitioner at one stage. Petition dismissed - decided against petitioner. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of a tender due to the implementation of Goods and Service Tax from 1.7.2017. The court ruled that the decision was not illegal or arbitrary as the tax regime had changed, and there was no concluded contract with the petitioner. The writ petition was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
