Tribunal sets aside order in successful appeal releasing Corporate Debtor from obligations

The appeal was successful as the Tribunal set aside the order admitting the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Corporate Debtor was released from the obligations imposed by the order, allowing it to operate independently. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to determine the fee of the Interim Resolution Professional, if appointed, to be paid by the Corporate Debtor. No costs were imposed on the parties involved in the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Appeal against admission of application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Completeness of demand notice under Section 8.
3. Maintainability of application under Section 9.
4. Service of notices to the Corporate Debtor.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed by the Director of a Corporate Debtor against the order admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant contended that the admitted dues were paid to a third party after negotiation with the Operational Creditor, which was disputed by the respondent. The appellant also raised issues regarding the completeness of the demand notice under Section 8 and the maintainability of the application under Section 9.

2. The appellant argued that the demand notice issued by the Operational Creditor under Section 8 was incomplete as it did not contain the required documents. However, the Corporate Debtor's reply mentioned that the notice was incomplete as it lacked a tabular form demonstrating the computation of default. The appellant's counsel further highlighted discrepancies in the notice, questioning its completeness.

3. The appellant also raised concerns about the application under Section 9 being incomplete, pointing to Form 5 submitted by the Operational Creditor. The appellant argued that the notice served was incomplete, and the Adjudicating Authority should have rejected the application. The appellant's contentions were supported by discrepancies in the documents submitted by the Operational Creditor.

4. It was revealed that the notices sent to the Corporate Debtor were returned unserved, except for those served to the Company Secretary and an ex-Director. The Operational Creditor's statement confirmed the unserved notices, indicating that the demand notice was not effectively served. Despite this, the Adjudicating Authority admitted the case without verifying the facts, leading to the appeal's success and the dismissal of the application under Section 9.

5. The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, declaring all subsequent actions illegal. The Corporate Debtor was released from the obligations imposed by the order, allowing it to function independently. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to determine the fee of the Interim Resolution Professional, if appointed, to be paid by the Corporate Debtor for the period of their service. The appeal was allowed without any costs imposed on the parties involved.

---