Tribunal partially allows appeal, sets aside pre-2007 demands, and remands post-2007 for re-quantification.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside demands pre-2007, penalties, and remanding for re-quantification post-2007. The dispute over the classification of services led to penalties being set aside. The appellants were registered under 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Service' and availed abatement. The matter of levy of service tax on works contract services was settled by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal accepted liability post-2007, remanding for re-quantification, and modified the impugned order based on these considerations.

---

---

Issues:
1. Eligibility for abatement under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service.
2. Applicability of service tax liability for the period before and after 1.6.2007.
3. Imposition of penalties based on the classification of services.

Analysis:
1. The appellants were registered under the category of 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Service' and availed 67% abatement as per Notification No. 15/2004-ST. The department contended that the activities undertaken by the appellants were finishing and completion services, not eligible for abatement. After adjudication, the demand was confirmed with interest and penalties imposed. The issue of eligibility for abatement was crucial in this case.

2. During the hearing, it was argued that the demand before 1.6.2007 was not sustainable based on a Supreme Court judgment. For the period after 1.6.2007, the appellant accepted liability, requesting a remand for quantification. The matter of levy of service tax on works contract services had been settled by the Supreme Court. The penalties imposed were challenged as unwarranted due to the interpretational nature of the issue.

3. The Tribunal acknowledged the settlement on service tax levy pre-2007 and accepted the liability post-2007, remanding for re-quantification. The dispute over the classification of services led to penalties being set aside. The impugned order was modified to set aside demands pre-2007, penalties, and remand for re-quantification post-2007. The appeal was partly allowed based on these considerations.

This comprehensive analysis covers the issues of abatement eligibility, service tax liability, and penalties, providing a detailed breakdown of the Tribunal's decision and the legal arguments presented during the case.

---