Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (12) TMI 68 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Invalid Re-assessment Quashed by ITAT for AY 2000-01 The Income Tax Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2000-01, ruling that the re-assessment was invalid as it was based on a ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Invalid Re-assessment Quashed by ITAT for AY 2000-01

                              The Income Tax Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2000-01, ruling that the re-assessment was invalid as it was based on a mere change of opinion without fresh material. The ITAT quashed the notice under Section 148 and the assessment order, allowing the assessee's appeal. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified, and the legitimacy of deductions claimed under Section 80HHb was upheld. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law and affirming the ITAT's decision to invalidate the re-assessment.




                              Issues:
                              1. Validity of re-assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2000-01.
                              2. Justification of additions made by the Assessing Officer.
                              3. Legitimacy of deductions claimed under Section 80HHb.
                              4. Adequacy of disclosure of material facts by the assessee.
                              5. Consideration of previous assessment year's additions.
                              6. Legal grounds for setting aside the assessment order.

                              Issue 1: Validity of re-assessment for AY 2000-01:
                              The Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Tribunal (ITAT) setting aside the assessment for AY 2000-01, arguing that the re-assessment was justified beyond four years due to the failure of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. The ITAT concluded that the re-assessment was a mere change of opinion without fresh material, rendering it unsustainable in law. The ITAT quashed the notice under Section 148 and the assessment order for AY 2000-01, allowing the assessee's appeal.

                              Issue 2: Justification of additions made by the Assessing Officer:
                              The Assessing Officer made additions to the income of the assessee, contending that certain amounts claimed as deductions under Section 80HHb were not legitimately eligible for such deductions. The CIT(A) upheld the additions, but the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the AO's opinion regarding the failure to disclose material facts amounted to a change of opinion without fresh material, making the re-assessment invalid.

                              Issue 3: Legitimacy of deductions claimed under Section 80HHb:
                              The dispute revolved around the legitimacy of deductions claimed under Section 80HHb by the assessee. The ITAT found that the AO's assertion of the ineligibility of the claimed deductions was based on a lack of fresh material and amounted to a mere change of opinion, leading to the allowance of the assessee's contentions and the quashing of the assessment order for AY 2000-01.

                              Issue 4: Adequacy of disclosure of material facts by the assessee:
                              The ITAT emphasized that the Assessing Officer had all necessary material facts before him during the original assessment, and the assertion of the assessee's failure to disclose all material facts was deemed unsustainable without specific details of undisclosed material. The ITAT concluded that the re-assessment lacked fresh material and was solely based on a change of opinion, leading to its invalidation.

                              Issue 5: Consideration of previous assessment year's additions:
                              The Court noted that the assessee had accepted additions made for the previous assessment year (AY 1998-99) and that the returns for AY 2000-01 were filed before the completion of the regular assessment for that year. This timeline was considered in evaluating the validity of the re-assessment for AY 2000-01.

                              Issue 6: Legal grounds for setting aside the assessment order:
                              The Court concurred with the ITAT's decision to set aside the assessment order for AY 2000-01, noting that the regular assessment was completed before the re-assessment and that the re-assessment lacked fresh material, making it a mere change of opinion without legal basis. No substantial question of law was found, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found