Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 67/95-CE in respect of intermediate goods captively consumed in the manufacture of final products, and whether the duty demand on such intermediate products was sustainable.
Analysis: The intermediate PP tapes/strips were manufactured within the factory and were captively consumed for production of the final goods. The issue was covered by earlier Tribunal decisions holding that such intermediate goods were not hit by the exclusionary clauses of Notification No. 67/95-CE and that exemption could not be denied merely because the final goods were cleared under SSI exemption. Following those decisions, the Tribunal found no basis to sustain the duty demand on the intermediate products.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 67/95-CE, and the demand of duty, interest, and penalty was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Intermediate goods captively consumed in the manufacture of final products are entitled to exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE unless they are specifically excluded by that notification.