Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether boilers cleared in CKD/SKD condition and assembled at the buyer's site became immovable property and, if so, whether duty could be demanded on the assembled boilers.
Analysis: The appeals were decided after remand in the light of the Supreme Court's directions and the Board's circulars. The decisive factual finding was that the assessee had cleared boiler components on payment of duty, the components were assembled piece by piece at the customer's site on a concrete foundation, and the resulting boiler could be removed only by dismantling it. On that footing, the assembled boiler and associated system had ceased to be movable goods and had become immovable property. The Tribunal treated that factual position as controlling and held that the settled legal position, as reflected in the binding precedents and the circulars, did not permit excise duty to be demanded on such immovable property.
Conclusion: The demand of excise duty on the assembled boilers was unsustainable and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods cleared in CKD/SKD condition which, on assembly and erection at the buyer's site, become immovable property are not excisable, and no duty can be demanded on the resultant structure as such.