Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product "Milk Treat" was classifiable under Tariff Heading 1905.32.11 as wafers coated with or containing chocolate, or under Tariff Heading 1905.32.19 as other wafers.
Analysis: The classification turned on the character of the coating used in the product. The relevant tariff structure distinguished between wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate and other wafers. The explanatory notes to Chapter 18 showed that preparations containing cocoa fall within that chapter, while Chapter 17 covers sugar confectionery including white chocolate not containing cocoa. The notes further stated that cocoa butter is not to be regarded as cocoa. On that basis, the product ingredients, which contained cocoa butter but no cocoa or chocolate, could not be treated as chocolate-coated or cocoa-containing goods for the purpose of the disputed heading.
Conclusion: The product was not classifiable under Tariff Heading 1905.32.11 and was correctly classifiable under Tariff Heading 1905.32.19.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the assessee was upheld and the differential duty demand based on the contrary classification was not sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, cocoa butter is not equivalent to cocoa, and where the product contains only cocoa butter without cocoa or chocolate, it cannot be classified as a chocolate-coated or cocoa-containing wafer under the relevant heading.