TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms penalties for exceeding cash loan limit under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>M/s Khairati Lal Fakir Chand Versus The Addl. C.I.T., Range Bulandshahar & Another</h3> M/s Khairati Lal Fakir Chand Versus The Addl. C.I.T., Range Bulandshahar & Another - TMI Issues:1. Interpretation of Section 269SS and 271-D of the Income Tax Act regarding penalty for cash loans exceeding statutory limit.Analysis:The case involved an appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order imposing penalties on an assessee for taking cash loans exceeding the statutory limit of Rs. 20,000. The appellant had taken multiple cash loans on different dates, and penalties were imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271-D read with Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act.The Commissioner of Income Tax partially allowed the appeal, considering exceptional circumstances for loans taken on weekends and reducing the penalties for those loans. However, penalties for loans taken on weekdays were upheld to the extent that they exceeded the statutory limit.Both the revenue and the assessee appealed to the Tribunal, which upheld the penalties for loans taken on weekdays but deleted the penalties for loans taken on weekends. The Tribunal's decision was based on the mandatory nature of the provisions in Section 269SS and 271-D, which impose penalties for non-compliance with the statutory scheme of not taking loans exceeding Rs. 20,000 in cash.The court analyzed the provisions of Section 269SS and 271-D, emphasizing that the bar against cash loans exceeding Rs. 20,000 was clear and unambiguous. The court disagreed with a previous Rajasthan High Court judgment that allowed adjustments for loans up to Rs. 20,000, stating that the language of the Act did not provide for such adjustments. The court clarified that penalties are mandatory for cash loans exceeding Rs. 20,000, regardless of whether the loan is taken in parts or in combination with outstanding loans.Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the revenue, upholding the penalties imposed on the assessee for cash loans exceeding the statutory limit. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the mandatory nature of penalties for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 269SS and 271-D of the Income Tax Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
